Showing posts with label Drug Delivery. Show all posts
Showing posts with label Drug Delivery. Show all posts

Thursday, December 24, 2015

Nanobots - The imagination

 

 

Saturday, May 3, 2014

Targeted failure of the week. Post No 148. Vintafolide

File:Vintafolide.svgMay 2 (Reuters) - Merck & Co Inc and Endocyte Inc said they had stopped a late-stage trial of their experimental ovarian cancer drug because it did not improve survival rates without the cancer worsening.
The trial was testing the drug, vintafolide, in combination with a chemotherapy drug, pegylated liposomal doxorubicin (PLD), compared to PLD plus a placebo.
An independent safety committee reviewing the trial had recommended that it be halted, the companies said in separate statements.
 
 

Saturday, November 16, 2013

Patent cliff, Life ycle management and formulation strategies

 
 
 
Generic-drug competition has become increasingly aggressive, especially in an environment where healthcare policies are placing stronger emphasis on pharmacoeconomics and demanding better treatment outcomes at a lower cost. A 2012 analysis by IMS Health estimated that patent expiries will reduce brand spending in developed markets by $127 billion through 2016 (1). With drug-development expenditures escalating at an alarming rate while R&D productivity continues to decline, branded drug-makers are under pressure to maximize the value of their products throughout their lifecycles.
 
Strategies:
 
Modified-release formulations
Switch-and-grow formulations
Expand-and-grow formulations
Combination Products
 

Thursday, July 25, 2013

ABC of controlled release through Osmotic Systems

Osmotically controlled oral drug-delivery systems have gained popularity because of the following advantages over other controlled-release strategies 
  • Zero-order kinetic release is achievable.
  • The drug is delivered at a constant rate that is independent of time and drug concentration.
  • The release rate is highly predictable.
  • Higher release rates are possible compared with conventional drug-delivery systems.
  • Drug release is independent of physiological factors of the gastrointestinal tract, including gastric pH and hydrodynamic conditions.
  • Drug release is generally not affected by the presence of food.
  • The release rate can be programmed by modulating release-control parameters.
  • Delivery may be delayed or pulsed if desired.
  • There is a high degree of in vivo-in vitro correlation.
  • Soluble and insoluble compounds can be delivered.
  • Production scale-up is easy.

Sunday, May 19, 2013

Quote of the day. Tesla


Современные учёные мыслят глубоко вместо того, чтобы мыслить ясно.
Чтобы мыслить ясно, нужно обладать здравым рассудком,
а мыслить глубоко можно и будучи совершенно сумасшедшим.


Никола Тесла

Saturday, May 4, 2013

Nanomedicine - new mantra for the old BS

I like the ambitious language and new promises in the field of nanomedicine. The statements sound like music!


"We have been hearing about the promise of nanomedicine for a long time, but it is now really starting to move," said Dan Peer, who runs a nanomedicine laboratory at Tel Aviv University.
 
"There is a new level of confidence in this approach among the big pharmaceutical companies ... We will see more and more products in clinical testing over the next few years and I think that is very exciting."
 
Nanoparticles made of polymers, gold and even graphene - a newly-discovered form of carbon - are now in various stages of development. In cancer alone, 117 drugs are being assessed using nanoparticle formulations, though most have yet to be tried on patients, according to Thomson Reuters Pharma data.

Friday, February 1, 2013

Targeted failure of the week. Post No 47. Thermodox

Thermodox looks like being extremely sexy approach for the treatment of HCC:
 

Who could imagine that this nice approach could fail???

Celsion Corp. (NASDAQ:CLSN) fell $6.51 (81%) to $1.51 on Thursday after reporting that IV ThermoDox plus radiofrequency ablation missed the primary endpoint of improving progression-free survival (PFS) vs. radiofrequency ablation alone in the Phase III HEAT trial to treat non-resectable hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC). The double-blind, sham-controlled trial was designed to show a 33% improvement in PFS with 80% power and a p-value of 0.05. Celsion, which has an SPA from FDA for the trial, said it will consider following the 701 patients enrolled in the trial to evaluate the secondary endpoint of overall survival (OS). The company declined to provide details, but said it is also conducting additional analysis of the data to assess the "future strategic value" of ThermoDox.

Friday, November 16, 2012

Another magic cure against cancer. Post No 24.

From here:
ImmunGene and Caliber Biotherapeutics are launching Valor Biotherapeutics as a joint venture. The upstart plans to use technology developed at UCLA to create new cancer therapies that marry antibodies to interferon, with licenses to three mAb-IFN fusion product candidates now in preclinical development. Singhvi, who will lead Valor, is the managing director of Caliber.
The idea driving the startup came from the lab of Professor Sherie Morrison at UCLA, which was licensed to ImmunGene. Morrison's mAb-IFN fusion protein technology is designed to deliver a payload of interferon right to specific tumor sites, similar to the approach taken by other antibody-drug conjugate programs.

Well, the approach to combine mAbs with IFN is in accordance with the modern paradigm, however there are even sexier approaches in terms of investment attraction. In any way we have to wish the authors of the idea good luck in hope that the approach will be helpful in our understanding of what works against cancer and what doesn't.

Monday, October 22, 2012

GBI report: Drug Delivery

Drug delivery technologies provide commercial opportunities for pharmaceutical companies by improving the chances of success for a drug development project. They enable the formulation of a promising molecule that might have poor solubility or require selective delivery to a particular tissue, such as the brain. Similarly, drug delivery technologies may enable companies to differentiate products within crowded therapeutic areas, facilitate life cycle management for existing drugs, and reposition existing drugs – proprietary or generic – in new indications where the needs of the patient population are different or, again, where more targeted delivery is required. Products that are reformulated with novel drug delivery systems do not meet the traditional criteria for innovative products – in other words, products that include new active moieties. Nevertheless, GBI Research’s analysis shows that the commercial success of existing products that rely on innovative drug delivery technologies is clear, and these products make significant positive changes for patients.
Well, it can be interesting...