Absolutely sober article:
Institutional Corruption of Pharmaceuticals and the Myth of Safe and Effective Drugs
Just a quote:
Institutional Corruption of Pharmaceuticals and the Myth of Safe and Effective Drugs
Just a quote:
The
industry measures “innovation” in terms of new molecular entities (NMEs), but
most NMEs provide at best minor clinical advantages over existing ones and may lawfully
be approved by the FDA even if they are inferior to previously approved drugs.
The preponderance of drugs without significant therapeutic gain dates back at least
35 years. From the mid-1970s through the mid-1990s, multiple assessments have
found that only 11 to 15.6 percent of NMEs provide an important therapeutic gain.
Millions of patients benefit from the one out of six drugs that are therapeutically
significant advances; but most R&D dollars are devoted to developing molecularly
different but therapeutically similar drugs, which tends to involve less risk
and cost for manufacturers. These drugs are then sold through competition based
on brand name, patent status, and newness, rather than on their therapeutic
merits.
No comments:
Post a Comment